Shop for Pittsburgh Steelers gear at Fanatics.com Shop for Pittsburgh Penguins Gear at Fanatics.com Pittsburgh Pirates gear at Fanatics.com
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21

Thread: The endless attack on Western societal norms continues - as I thought it would

  1. #1
    Member
    Steeltime's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    The nearest Steelers bar.
    Posts
    7,233
    Rep Power
    211

    The endless attack on Western societal norms continues - as I thought it would

    About four years ago, I debated Trog, elftardPoloLiar and Tibs on this forum about gay marriage. I did not have any strong feeling about gay marriage, but pointed out that marriage was designed (1) mainly for the benefit of children, who cannot protect themselves and (2) that a general societal acceptance of gay marriage would lead to the "next" battle, in an endless series of battles by the left to dismember traditional Western civilization. Traditional Western civilization is founded on a belief in God, an enduring faith in two-parent families, reverence towards hard work and self-reliance, and a belief that government is a necessary evil.

    Now, all such beliefs are under attack. Converse shows just how far our society has descended with their latest ad campaign, featuring an 11-year old transvestite (transsexual? hard to keep straight) boy, among others, in this ad:



    https://twitter.com/Converse/status/...en-drag-kid%2F

    Yes, that is a boy in the front, dressed in drag.

    So during the debate four years or so ago, I asked, "Okay, gay marriage, great. But where does this end? Because it NEVER ENDS in the minds of those seeking to forever deconstruct Western civilization. What's next? Pedophilia?"

    Trog and probably elftardPololiar mocked me. "Oh, please, nobody supports pedophilia. That is absurd."

    Uhh, yes, they do, and no, my position was certainly not absurd. As soon as the "gay marriage" debate ended, the loony fringe moved on to transsexuals, and gender identity, and claiming that pre-pubescent kids should be allowed to dress up as the opposite sex. Told 'ya.

    But dressing up 10 and 11 year old kids in opposite gender clothes is sick. Using those disturbed children in sexual displays to sell shit is worse than sick. The people responsible for the ad should be investigated for child abuse. Thankfully, the comments to the Convert to Another Shoe Company ad show that most of America remains sane.

    Unlike the freaks who thought dressing up an 11-year old boy as a creepy girl was a good idea.
    Quote Originally Posted by Elfiero View Post
    Of course I'm despicable...

    The Following 6 Users Like This Post:



  2. #2
    Go research how young boys were dressed in the early 20th century and then explain your argument.

  3. #3
    Member

    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    1,787
    Rep Power
    101
    Quote Originally Posted by Troglodyte View Post
    Go research how young boys were dressed in the early 20th century and then explain your argument.
    We’re not in the early 20th century. Dress your own boys like little girls if you want. But don’t tell me the shit is normal.

    The Following 2 Users Like This Post:



  4. #4
    Member
    Steeltime's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    The nearest Steelers bar.
    Posts
    7,233
    Rep Power
    211
    Quote Originally Posted by Troglodyte View Post
    Go research how young boys were dressed in the early 20th century and then explain your argument.
    1. Men used to wear wigs. Big powdered wigs. It was the norm.
    2. Boys used to wear flowing robes. It was the norm.
    3. Norms changed.
    4. So 11-year old boys dressing up as girls, whatever the style-of-the-moment, has never been the norm.

    If that is too difficult to understand, have a 3rd grader explain it to you.
    Quote Originally Posted by Elfiero View Post
    Of course I'm despicable...

    The Following 2 Users Like This Post:



  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by SCSteeler4life View Post
    We’re not in the early 20th century. Dress your own boys like little girls if you want. But don’t tell me the shit is normal.
    Tell it to your great-grandparents who caved to societal norms and dressed your grandfather like a little bitch. Freaks!

  6. #6
    Member
    IndySteel's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Carmel, IN
    Posts
    10,547
    Rep Power
    277
    Sounds like Flog's yoga pants are wedged up his ass pretty good.

    The Following 2 Users Like This Post:



  7. #7
    Member
    Steeltime's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    The nearest Steelers bar.
    Posts
    7,233
    Rep Power
    211
    Quote Originally Posted by SCSteeler4life View Post
    We’re not in the early 20th century. Dress your own boys like little girls if you want. But don’t tell me the shit is normal.
    That's exactly what he is telling you. Dressing an 11-year old boy as a 1970's whore is just fine with him.

    Oh, and my question as to what is next, pedophilia? Lookee here:

    Government school officials in California think it is “really important” to teach children about pedophilia and pederasty in the classroom because it is a “sexual orientation.” That is according to a top official for California’s Brea Olinda School District, who admitted to parents that it was being done — and that it would continue, despite the outrage.

    “This is done because we are talking about historical perspectives of how gender relations and different types of sexual orientations have existed in history,” said BOUSD Assistant Superintendent of Curricula Kerrie Torres in a matter-of-fact way, sounding almost oblivious to how the bombshell might sound to normal people.


    https://redrightvideos.com/video-cal...l-orientation/

    Pfffft, what the hell was I thinking in asking where the hell this winds up?!?
    Quote Originally Posted by Elfiero View Post
    Of course I'm despicable...

    The Following User Likes This Post:



  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Steeltime View Post
    1. Men used to wear wigs. Big powdered wigs. It was the norm.
    2. Boys used to wear flowing robes. It was the norm.
    3. Norms changed.
    4. So 11-year old boys dressing up as girls, whatever the style-of-the-moment, has never been the normal.
    You seeing that picture as a “sexual display” isn’t normal. If you don’t understand that, have a psychiatrist explain it to you.

  9. #9
    The sad thing is Converse actually HURTS the LGBT community by promoting these types of crazy stereotypes of what it means to be "gay".

    Being strange, dressing up like fools in rainbows, having piercings everywhere is not equivalent to being gay. Sure some are like that just like some straight people are like that too. But this continuation of the idea gay HAS to equal this type of flamboyant faggot stuff and gay pride parade garbage and bathhouse acceptance and boytoy promiscuity is part of the reason the LGBT community isn't already accepted.

    There are parts of ALL cultures (white, black, hispanic, asian, LGBT) that I am never going to accept but that doesn't make me a bigot against them all. Nor does it mean I don't accept different cultures or lifestyles.

    But damn if I'm going to budge when it comes to dressing appropriately for events, showing some restraint for your sexual proclivities in public, or expecting some dignity with how you treat your body and others. People need to realize that having an idea of what "decorum" means does not equate to disliking whole cultures or classes of people.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Steeltime View Post
    1. Men used to wear wigs. Big powdered wigs. It was the norm.
    2. Boys used to wear flowing robes. It was the norm.
    3. Norms changed.
    4. So 11-year old boys dressing up as girls, whatever the style-of-the-moment, has never been the norm.

    If that is too difficult to understand, have a 3rd grader explain it to you.

    Also men played women in plays and other type of events as it was illegal for women too. Sooo trig is saying we go back to that too cause you know

  11. #11
    Esteemed Throbbing Member

    Superman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Trampa, FL
    Posts
    12,302
    Rep Power
    313
    Quote Originally Posted by Troglodyte View Post
    Go research how young boys were dressed in the early 20th century and then explain your argument.




    yeah, i see your point.

  12. #12
    Esteemed Throbbing Member

    Superman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Trampa, FL
    Posts
    12,302
    Rep Power
    313


    but wait ...



    there's more



    flog... never right. ever.

    The Following 2 Users Like This Post:



  13. #13
    Member
    Steeltime's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    The nearest Steelers bar.
    Posts
    7,233
    Rep Power
    211
    Quote Originally Posted by Troglodyte View Post
    You seeing that picture as a “sexual display” isn’t normal. If you don’t understand that, have a psychiatrist explain it to you.
    You are seriously ill if you don't find the image of an 11-year old boy dressed like a caricature of a 1970 hooker disturbing. He looks like the Jodie Foster character from Taxi Driver.



    You think his attire is acceptable. No problem.

    And you suggest that I need help? Jee-zus, use your Obamacare psychiatric insurance.
    Quote Originally Posted by Elfiero View Post
    Of course I'm despicable...

    The Following User Likes This Post:



  14. #14
    Didn't know Converse still existed.

    The Following 2 Users Like This Post:



  15. #15
    Member
    IndySteel's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Carmel, IN
    Posts
    10,547
    Rep Power
    277
    F61FC856-F536-416C-8218-95A86DABA292.jpg

    Darla say my dictate good.

    The Following User Likes This Post:



  16. #16
    This is not advancement of our culture or society. It's a degrading it. They should smack the shit out of that young boys parents. What the hell is wrong with his father. You sexualize your kid you vile dung heap.

  17. #17
    Member
    Lunar's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Location Location
    Posts
    4,699
    Rep Power
    160
    Is that the same boy that danced at a gay bar?
    “they had come to a time when no one dared speak his mind, when fierce, growling dogs roamed everywhere, and when you had to watch your comrades torn to pieces after confessing to shocking crimes.”

  18. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Steeltime View Post
    You are seriously ill if you don't find the image of an 11-year old boy dressed like a caricature of a 1970 hooker disturbing.
    I find every outfit in that picture atrocious, none of them sexual. That’s where your imagination went. You know who else finds converse sexy? Rex Ryan.

  19. #19
    Member SteelerInLebanon's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Lebanon, OH (Near Kings Island)
    Posts
    6,173
    Rep Power
    190
    His father is probably his mother. Or something like that.

  20. #20
    Is that Corey Booker?

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


Follow @SteeIerNation